About the Author(s)
Didier N. Buwani  
Department of Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
R. Tseka H. Dolamo
Department of Philosophy, Practical and Systematic Theology, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Citation
Buwani, D.N. & Dolamo, R.T.H., 2020, ‘Corrigendum: Climate change in sub-Saharan Africa: Nature restoration as an ethical issue’, Theologia Viatorum 44(1), a46. https://doi.org/10.4102/TV.v44i1.46Note: DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.4102/TV.v43i1.4
|
|
Correction
|
Corrigendum: Climate change in sub-Saharan Africa: Nature restoration as an ethical issue
|
Didier N. Buwani, R. Tseka H. DolamoPublished: 21 Oct. 2020
Copyright: © 2020. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
|
In the version of the article initially published, Buwani, D.N. & Dolamo, R.T.H., 2019, ‘Climate change in sub-Saharan Africa: Nature restoration as an ethical issue’, Theologia Viatorum 43(1), a4. https://doi.org/10.4102/TV.v43i1.4, on page 4, the acronym ‘REDD’ was incorrectly defined. The correct definition for the acronym ‘REDD’ should be ‘reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation’ instead of ‘deforestation and forest degradation’. The correct definition of the term is updated in the sentence as follows:
Therefore, mechanisms to conserve the forest, such as reducing emission from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD), could assist in the mitigation of climate change, reduce vulnerability and enable people to adapt (Peach Brown et al. 2014:759).
This correction does not alter the study’s findings of significance or overall interpretation of the study’s results. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.
|
|
